The unveiling of the King National Memorial will have special meaning for me, because I attended the 1963 March on Washington where King gave his “I Have a Dream” speech and contributed to the King Memorial’s initial design. San Francisco’s ROMA Design Group incorporated my ideas about King’s historical significance in a design that won an international competition. On August 28 – the forty-eighth anniversary of the march – I’ll return to the National Mall to see the final result of a collaboration with ROMA that began in the spring of 2000.
The Martin Luther King Memorial. Credit: Charles Dharapak/AP.
Although Coretta Scott King selected me in 1985 to edit and publish the papers of her late husband, I urged ROMA’s principal architects, Bonnie Fisher and Boris Dramov, to reject the notion of a heroic Great Man memorial. My own activism during the 1960s was influenced by the bottom-up grassroots organizing approach of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), which saw King as a product of the movement rather than its instigator. Nonetheless, we agreed that a King memorial to be built next to Washington’s Tidal Basin near the Lincoln Memorial should celebrate the Dream speech, which eloquently expressed the larger historical significance of the African-American freedom struggle.
I recommended that the design visualize the vivid metaphorical language of King’s 1963 oration, especially the passage “With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope.” We imagined visitors entering the memorial through an opening cut through the granite core of a Mountain of Despair. The removed slice – the Stone of Hope – would be thrust forward and turned slightly so that visitors entering through the Mountain would encounter an inscription of King’s words on the slab’s smooth surface.
Rather than a familiar passage from the “dream” refrain, we preferred a passage from his prepared text that insisted that “the architects of our republic” had signed “a promissory note” – “a promise that all men, yes, black men and well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’” King’s call for the nation to “live out the true meaning of its creed” would, we believed, serve as an enduring reminder to Americans that the nation’s democratic ideals had not yet been realized.
The only point of contention was whether the design would include a statute of King. Bonnie and Boris soon persuaded me, however, that many visitors – and perhaps the jurors for the competition – would miss seeing a statue of King. We settled on an image of King that would be sculpted into the rough edge of the Stone of Hope facing toward the Tidal Basin. Visitors standing at the edge of the Basin would be able to turn back and see King’s visage emerging unfinished from the Stone.
For a model, I supplied the photograph by Bob Fitch on the cover of my edition of The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr. that depicted King not as a charismatic orator but instead as a thoughtful leader standing in front of his office desk. With Gandhi’s portrait on the wall behind him, King holds a pen in his right hand. We imagined him taking a break from drafting his reference to the “Promissory Note,” symbolically looking across time at the memorial to Thomas Jefferson, one of the nation’s founding “architects” and principal author of the Declaration of Independence. The two men would serve as historical frames for a profound perpetual dialogue about the meaning of American democracy.
Our design won the design competition, which attracted almost nine hundred entries from 33 countries. We soon learned, however, that the ultimate fate of our design would be decided by the King Memorial Project Foundation and the various commissions in charge of what can be built on the Washington Mall. During the next few years, we watch our design move very slowly toward realization, as Foundation officials guided it through the approval process and struggled to raise the $120 million needed to build it.
Then, early in 2006, Foundation officials asked me to suggest the King quotations to appear on the memorial. I welcomed this assignment, which would utilize what I had learned editing King’s papers, but I was dismayed that the Foundation wanted quotes on only four themes, “Justice, Democracy, Love, and Hope.” I wondered why not other themes, such as nonviolence, religion, peace, and poverty. The Foundation’s instructions eliminated King’s forceful statements against poverty and the war in Vietnam.
About this time I also learned that the Memorial Foundation had hired a Chinese master sculptor, Lei Yixin, to depict King on the Stone of Hope. Although some critics insisted that an African-American sculptor should have been chosen, I was mainly concerned about whether Lei’s sculpture would be convincing and consistent with the memorial’s overall themes. I also wondered what King would think of the decision to lower labor costs by outsourcing much of the stone work for the memorial to a nation without independent labor unions.
When I see the completed memorial, I’ll be disappointed that some of my favorite quotes were not chosen and that the image of King that I imagined has been replaced with large-scale imposing image of a confrontational, perhaps even authoritarian, figure. Nonetheless, rather than regretting these departures from ROMA’s original design, I look forward to appreciating the opportunity I’ve had to preserve King’s legacy for future generations.
Published Encyclopedia Britannica Blog: http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2011/08/designing-king-memorial/
Adapted from "Designing the King National Memorial" @A History of a Just & Peaceful Future